University of the Virgin Islands v. Petersen-Springer
District Court, Virgin Islands
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
2Per curiam
The University of the Virgin Islands appeals the jury verdict in favor of Josephine Petersen-Springer. A review of the record, the pleadings, and all other relevant documents reveals that the trial judge erred in not finding, as a matter of law, an express contract between the parties, and in submitting equitable claims to the jury without making independent findings of fact. Accordingly, this Court will vacate the judgment below and remand for a new trial.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The following facts are undisputed. In August 1988, Josephine Petersen-Springer [“Springer” or…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Carol Aman Jeanette Johnson v. Cort Furniture Rental CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Patzig v. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Hershey Foods Corporation v. Ralph Chapek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- Morales v. Sun Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Fitz v. Islands Mechanical Contractor, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2010
- Henry v. Government of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2004
- Phillips v. AndrewsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2004
- Virgin Islands Water & Power Authority v. General Electric International, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.