Legal Opinion

Ross v. Boswell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Benton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit by Parnham Boswell, against- John Ross, to recover for the use and occupation of land.

Ross answered:

1. In general denial;

2. Items of set-off;

3. By way of counter-claim; and, ■

*2364. That the plaintiff is not the real party in interest, and is without right to bring this suit, because, by deed duly executed, he assigned the cause of action in this •case to John E. Boswell, Charles P. Boswell, Arthur C. Boswell, Hiram A. Boswell and Duncan McA. Williams, for the benefit of creditors, and that they still held the same at the commencement of this suit.

A copy of the deed was not made a part of,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Raymond v. PritchardIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Compton v. DavidsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Isenhour v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Hunter v. N. Y., Ontario & Western R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railway Co. v. McVayIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Wasson v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Hunter v. New York, Ontario & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API