Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Cablevision Systems Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Skelos, J.P.

A party who calls a witness to testify to facts within his or her knowledge is required by statute to pay that witness, inter alia, $15 for every day of his or her attendance at trial (see CPLR 8001). The question presented on this appeal is whether payment voluntarily made to a fact witness, far in excess of that mandatory witness fee, rendered the witness’s testimony inadmissible or, alternatively, warranted a specific jury instruction pertaining to potential bias. We hold that, while the substantial payment made by the defendant Communications Specialists,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  3. Coleman v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People Ex Rel. Kraushaar Bros. & Co. v. ThorpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. People v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. Cablevision Systems Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Corradino v. Liquidnet Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  3. In re AshtonOregon Supreme Court · 2026
  4. In re AshtonOregon Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API