People v. Jackson
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
As the People candidly concede, the lineup testimony of two of the People’s witnesses should have been suppressed. Since a removal order had been issued to secure defendant’s attendance at the pretrial identification procedures, defendant had a right to the presence of counsel during the lineups (People v Coleman, 43 NY2d 222). Inasmuch as defendant did not waive that right, the lineups, which were conducted in the absence of counsel, violated defendant’s constitutional rights.
Further,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. DodtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. ColemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. CoatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. CoatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. InnissNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Ellis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. ShermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.