Legal Opinion

People v. Jackson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 1989PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

As the People candidly concede, the lineup testimony of two of the People’s witnesses should have been suppressed. Since a removal order had been issued to secure defendant’s attendance at the pretrial identification procedures, defendant had a right to the presence of counsel during the lineups (People v Coleman, 43 NY2d 222). Inasmuch as defendant did not waive that right, the lineups, which were conducted in the absence of counsel, violated defendant’s constitutional rights.

Further,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. DodtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. ColemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. People v. CoatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. People v. CoatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. InnissNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Ellis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. People v. ShermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API