Legal Opinion

People v. Ross

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 13, 1991No. 91SA18PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an attorney discipline case. A hearing board of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee found that the respondent neglected a legal matter entrusted to him, intentionally failed to seek the lawful objec-fives of his client, and intentionally failed to carry out a contract of employment. The hearing panel approved the board’s findings and conclusions, except for the board’s recommendation that the respondent be suspended for thirty days. The panel recommended that the respondent be suspended for ninety days and be assessed the costs of the proceedings. Neither the assistant disciplinary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. CrimaldiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. People v. MassonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. RossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. People v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. People v. StaufferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. People v. ProffittSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  5. People v. DolanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API