Legal Opinion

Davis v. Brest-Taylor (In re Brest-Taylor)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California

Decided August 18, 2017No. Case No. 17-10310-B-13; Adv. Proceeding No. 17-1009-BPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

René Lástrete II, Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court

INTRODUCTION

11 U.S.C. § 105 permits a bankruptcy court to issue any order or judgment “necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of [the Bankruptcy Code.]”1 Cases have held this section empowers the court to enjoin future filings to prevent abuse of the bankruptcy process. See generally, In re Leavitt, 209 B.R. 935 (9th Cir. BAP 1997) aff'd, on other grounds (In re Leavitt), 171 F.3d 1219 (9th Cir. 1999). In this dismissed case, the United States Trustee seeks an injunction…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. In Re Jonathan Barnes Leavitt, Debtor. Jonathan Barnes Leavitt v. Carlos SotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb, Debtors. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb v. Harry W. Heid, Chapter 13 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API