Legal Opinion

Coppola v. Federated National Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 25, 2006No. 4D06-465PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

We reverse an order denying statutory attorney’s fees incurred by the insured in defending a declaratory judgment action initiated by Federated National Insurance Company (Federated). Federated had claimed that there was no coverage for a pending personal injury claim under the insured’s homeowner’s policy.

We conclude that Federated’s voluntary dismissal of its declaratory action conferred a benefit on the defendant insured. Therefore, the insured is entitled to attorney’s fees as the prevailing party pursuant to section 627.428, Florida Statutes.

In the declaratory action, Federated claimed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Caufield v. CanteleSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Wollard v. Lloyd's & Companies of Lloyd'sSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  3. Danis Industries v. GROUND IMP. TECH.Supreme Court of Florida · 1994
  4. OAG CORP. v. Britamco UnderwritersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. O'MALLEY v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Axis Surplus Insurance v. Contravest Construction Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2012
  2. Explorer Insurance Co. v. CajusmaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Kinsale Insurance Company v. BEST WELLNESS USA, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022
  4. Pineda v. State Farm Florida Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API