People v. Feazel

I concur with the majority opinion in its entirety but write separately with regard to the issue of defendant’s consecutive sentences for drug delivery and drug conspiracy because I believe that existing case law in Michigan is wrongly decided.

Defendant’s sentence for conspiracy to deliver cocaine in this case was ordered to run consecutively to the sentences from Isabella County because the trial court believed it was a major controlled substance offense under MCL 761.2; MSA 28.843(12). For this reason, the trial court believed that the consecutive sentencing provision found in MCL…