Legal Opinion

Encino Business Management, Inc. v. Prize Frize, Inc. (In Re Prize Frize, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 11, 1993No. BAP No. CC-92-1328-PVO, Bankruptcy No. LA91-67651-KMPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PERRIS, Bankruptcy Judge:

The bankruptcy court granted the debt- or’s motion to reject its license agreement with appellant Encino Business Management, Inc. (“Encino) and in its order stated Encino may retain its rights under 11 U.S.C. § 365(n)(l)(B) 1 if it pays presently due and future license fees and waives any rights of setoff with respect to the contract. Encino filed this timely appeal, objecting to the requirement that it pay past due and future license fees. We AFFIRM the bankruptcy court’s order.

FACTS

The debtor, Prize Frize, Inc., 2 is the owner and licensor of all technology,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harold J. Romain v. Admiral Harold Shear, Administrator of the Department of Transportation, Maritime AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Schieber v. Hooper (In Re Hooper)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Credit Alliance Corp. v. Idaho Asphalt Supply, Inc. (In Re Blumer)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,230 in Re Marquam Investment Corporation, Debtor. Susan Brewer v. Erwin & Erwin, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. McCoy v. Bank of America (In Re McCoy)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Microsoft Corp. v. DAK Industries, Inc. (In re DAK Industries, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. In Re Prize Frize, Inc., Debtor. Encino Business Management, Inc. v. Prize Frize, Inc. U.S. TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Turner v. California Department of Real Estate (In re Turner)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. In Re Dak Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. In re: Javier JimenezUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API