Legal Opinion

Application of Alan J. Lemin

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 28, 1966No. Patent Appeal 7580PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Acting Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals,1 adhered to on reconsideration, affirming the examiner’s rejection of process claims 3-5 and composition claims 6-10 in application serial No. 32,518, filed May 31, 1960, for “Organic Compounds and Process.”

The invention is directed to a new use of an old compound and its position isomer. Appellant has found that a-ethynyl1-naphthalenemethanol and a-ethynyl-2-naphthalenemethanol are active against plant pathogenic fungi and that, when applied to seeds or to the soil in which the seeds are planted,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peter M. Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. In re OelrichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  3. Application of Alan J. LeminCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  4. Application of Rudolf Beckmann, Erich Behr and Franz Joseph HusterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  5. Peter M. Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API