Legal Opinion

Rolfe v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 14, 1973No. [No. 271, September Term, 1972.]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

We shall here be concerned with the notice provisions in Code (1957, 1969 Repl. Vol., 1972 Cum. Supp.) Art. 93, §§ 7-501 and 7-502, the failure of a personal representative to give the notice required by § 7-502 when applying for commissions and whether under the circumstances of this case exceptions to the ratification of the administration account filed some days after that account was ratified by the court may be used to reopen the question of commissions.

Appellees, A. Leland Clark and R. Edwin Brown, are the personal representatives of the estate of Bertha G. Rolfe. Since she died on June…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. Skyline Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  2. Clark v. WolmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  3. American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  4. Thomas v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  5. Riddleberger v. GoellerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tyson v. Masten Lumber & Supply, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Carrier v. Crestar Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Prince George's County v. BlumbergCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Clark v. RolfeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Cottman v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API