Legal Opinion

State v. Bays

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 10, 1998No. 20425-8-II, 22140-3-IIPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

These consolidated cases involve the interpretation of RCW 10.05.010, which provides that a person charged with a traffic infraction, misdemeanor, or gross misdemeanor under RCW 46, is “not eligible for a deferred prosecution program more than once in any five-year period.” Timothy Bays and Warren Ballard each committed a new offense less than five years after the completion or termination of an earlier deferred prosecution program. In each case, the superior court found that this fact did not cause Bays or Ballard to be ineligible for a second deferred prosecution. We conclude that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  2. In Re the Marriage of GilbertCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  3. State v. VingeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  4. State v. GettmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kitsap County v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Kitsap County v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Yousoufian v. Office of Ron SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Yousoufian v. Office of SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In re the Parental Rights to K.M.M.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API