Bauhaus USA, Inc. v. Copeland ex rel. Holmes
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVES, Justice,
for the Court.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 1. Rashan Danielle Holmes, a minor, was injured in an automobile accident on June 1, 1996. Holmes was covered under the Bauhaus Group Employee Benefit Plan (the Plan) as a dependent of her mother and guardian, Lillie Regina Holmes Copeland.1 The Plan advanced payments for Holmes’ medical expenses of more than $46,000.2
¶ 2. The Plan contains a reimbursement and subrogation clause, which states:
Medical care benefits are not payable to or for a person covered under this Plan when the injury or illness to the Covered Person occurs…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Egelhoff v. Egelhoff Ex Rel. BreinerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Guardianship of HolmesMississippi Supreme Court · 2007