Legal Opinion

Bauhaus USA, Inc. v. Copeland ex rel. Holmes

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 2007No. 2006-CA-00465-SCTPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice,

for the Court.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 1. Rashan Danielle Holmes, a minor, was injured in an automobile accident on June 1, 1996. Holmes was covered under the Bauhaus Group Employee Benefit Plan (the Plan) as a dependent of her mother and guardian, Lillie Regina Holmes Copeland.1 The Plan advanced payments for Holmes’ medical expenses of more than $46,000.2

¶ 2. The Plan contains a reimbursement and subrogation clause, which states:

Medical care benefits are not payable to or for a person covered under this Plan when the injury or illness to the Covered Person occurs…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Egelhoff v. Egelhoff Ex Rel. BreinerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Guardianship of HolmesMississippi Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API