Legal Opinion

Breighner v. Chesney

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 10, 2004No. 1:02-cv-01832PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CONNER, District Judge.

Presently before the court is a petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) in which petitioner, Darrell Wayne Breighner (“Breighner”), asserts that the Superior Court of Pennsylvania acted unreasonably in finding sufficient evidence to support his conviction for arson. Resolution of this issue requires the court to determine whether recent amendments to the federal habeas statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, mandate that federal courts accord a “presumption of correctness” to factual findings of a state court when the state court has previously considered and rejected…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Saranchak v. BeardDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Showers v. BeardDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Stevens v. HornDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. BRENDAN J. CARTER v. KATHY BRITTAIN, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  5. BRENNER v. OVERMEYERDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API