Breighner v. Chesney
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CONNER, District Judge.
Presently before the court is a petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) in which petitioner, Darrell Wayne Breighner (“Breighner”), asserts that the Superior Court of Pennsylvania acted unreasonably in finding sufficient evidence to support his conviction for arson. Resolution of this issue requires the court to determine whether recent amendments to the federal habeas statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, mandate that federal courts accord a “presumption of correctness” to factual findings of a state court when the state court has previously considered and rejected…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Saranchak v. BeardDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Showers v. BeardDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Stevens v. HornDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- BRENDAN J. CARTER v. KATHY BRITTAIN, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- BRENNER v. OVERMEYERDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.