Legal Opinion

Unger v. Rosenblum

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 2016No. S063766PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Petitioners seek review of the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 65 (2016) (IP 65), arguing that the ballot title does not satisfy the requirements of ORS 250.035(2). This court reviews a certified ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with the requirements of that statute. See ORS 250.085(5). For the following reasons, we refer the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification.

IP 65, if enacted, would establish a “High School Graduation and College and Career Readiness Fund” (Readiness Fund) within the state General Fund for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wolf v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Pelikan v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kain v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Novick v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Unger v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API