Legal Opinion

City of Detroit v. King

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 1994No. Docket Nos. 146996, 159077Published

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P.J.

In these consolidated appeals as of right, plaintiff City of Detroit appeals the trial *171court’s order to pay $142,350 as just compensation for defendant’s property, and defendant appeals the denial of her motion for expert witness fees. We affirm.

i

This is a condemnation case. Defendant owned property at 306 Garfield and had, since 1976, operated a 2 Vi story, thirteen-bedroom, twenty-bed, adult foster care facility on it. On December 21, 1988, a fire caused by careless smoking by a resident destroyed the building. By the time the city filed its condemnation suit on July 31, 1990, the property,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. Michael's PrescriptionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. In Re City of Detroit for a Park SiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Hartland Township v. KucykowiczMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Department of Transportation v. DonderoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State Highway Commission v. McLaughlinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API