Legal Opinion

In Re City of Detroit for a Park Site

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1924No. Docket No. 103PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Exercising the right of eminent domain the common council of the city of Detroit declared it necessary to take certain designated private property “for a site for park purposes and for municipal build ings to be thereon constructed.” Appropriate proceedings were taken in the recorder’s court, a jury found the public necessity for the purposes alleged, and awarded compensation to the several property owners. John and Elizabeth Hartner owned two parcels of land, in part taken, were awarded $116,341.51, and, feeling aggrieved, have appealed, claiming the real purpose of the ei-ty is to acquire a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Penn. Schuyl. V. R. v. ClearySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Matter of City of New York (Ely Avenue)New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Warren v. City of Grand HavenMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Township of Custer v. DawsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Widening of Fulton StreetMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Village of Grosse Pointe Shores v. AyresMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. In Re Widening of Michigan Ave.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Department of Conservation v. ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Cleveland v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API