Legal Opinion

Department of Transportation v. Bridges

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1996No. A96A0210PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Judge.

In the underlying action, Bridges sought recovery from the Department of Transportation (DOT) on a theory of inverse condemnation. Upon our grant of its application for interlocutory appeal, the DOT appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment.

Bridges’ complaint is based on the DOT’s closing of Chumley Circle at its intersection with Canton Road. Bridges’ property is an undeveloped commercial tract of land which abuts Chumley Circle near its intersection with Canton Road. It is the only property in the county with a Chumley Circle street address and the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tift County v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  2. Department of Transportation v. 2.734 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Felton v. State Highway BoardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  4. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. FountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  5. Hillman v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. BridgesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Department of Transportation v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Department of Transportation v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API