Legal Opinion
Murdoch v. Rosenberg & Associates, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 11, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2012-0036PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Juliette Murdoch brings claims against defendants Rosenberg & Associates, LLC (“the Firm”) and its managing member and named partner Diane Rosenberg (“the named partner”) alleging that the defendants sent her and other consumers form debt collection notices threaten ing legal action before properly verifying the creditors’ claims, in violation of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., the Maryland Consumer Protection Act, Md. Code Ann., Com. Law § 13-301 et seq., the Maryland Consumer…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- James Cameron v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- John Sinclair v. Richard G. KleindienstCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Darby v. U.S. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- United States Ex Rel. Lois Sero v. Peter PreiserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lemon v. KramerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Ananiev v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. v. BivinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Martin v. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Bullock v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.