Legal Opinion

Witherspoon v. City of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 2001No. 15 E.D. 1999PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

ZAPPALA, Justice

We granted allowance of appeal to consider the extent of the inquiry to be made regarding a plaintiffs efforts to serve process for purposes of determining whether the filing of a writ of summons tolled the limitation period for commencing *390an action. We find no error in the decisions below and therefore affirm.

John Witherspoon alleges that he injured his foot when he slipped and fell on a loose shower drain at Holmesburg Prison on September 17, 1994. On March 15, 1995, in compliance with 42 Pa.C.S. § 5522, Witherspoon’s counsel…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lamp v. HeymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Cintas Corp. v. Lee's Cleaning Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Farinacci v. Beaver County Industrial Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Zarlinsky v. LaudenslagerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Salay v. BraunSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. McCreesh v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Grove v. GuilfoyleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Ramsay v. PierreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Parr v. RomanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Sheets v. Liberty Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API