Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1959No. Crim. 6595PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, J. pro tem. *

We have concluded that the failure of the prosecution to reveal the name of an informer may not be taken advantage of by the defendant to escape the judgment that followed her conviction on a charge of illegal possession of heroin. Upon her appeal from the judgment, it is to be affirmed, therefore.

The defendant put on no defense, so our facts come from the unchallenged testimony of the People’s witnesses. On each of the last two days of July, some deputies sheriff watched the door of the place where the defendant resided, and saw persons known to them to be drug addicts,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Priestly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. People v. McShannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. TorresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. PrivettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. People v. CedenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. People v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API