People v. De Pelanconi
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the- Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the, opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.
One Ramirez, being in custody under a bench warrant issued out of a Superior Court, upon an information for the crime of forgery, was ordered to be admitted to bail in the sum of $2,000, and the defendants in this action executed an undertaking in the form prescribed by section 1287, Penal Code. The bond becoming forfeited, this action was brought by the district attorney against the sureties. '
*410The only point presented on this appeal is: The action should have been brought in the name of the county; the county is the only party in interest, as the money recovered must go into the county…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of San Francisco v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- People v. PennimanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. HodgesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Malheur County v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- County of Wheatland v. VanMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Elrage v. County of GreenleeArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- People v. Bail Hotline Bail Bonds, Inc.California Superior Court · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.