Legal Opinion

In re Farlow

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 25, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Respondent pled guilty to one count of accommodation distribution of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(D) and § 841(b)(4) and one count of possession of methylenedioxymethamphetamine hydrochloride, also known as MDMA or "ecstasy," in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844(a).

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel petitions the Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, and to appoint an attorney to protect respondent's clients' interests pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent's license to practice law in this…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re FarlowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  2. In Re FarlowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  3. In Re FarlowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API