Legal Opinion

In Re Farlow

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 27, 2008No. 26352PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In contemplation of filing a Petition for Reinstatement, respondent discovered a scrivener’s error in the Court’s original opinion in this matter. The Court reissues its opinion as follows.

In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. In the agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to the imposition of any sanction set forth in Rule 7(b), RLDE. Respondent requests that if a suspension is imposed, it be made retroactive to the date of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re FarlowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. In re FarlowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re DevineSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. In Re FarlowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. CutroSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API