Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hemphill

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County

Decided November 14, 2014No. 2012-04425Published

1Opinion of the Court

TUNNELL, J,

ORDER

And now, this 14th day of November, 2014, the plaintiff’s petition for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 Pa. C.S.A. §2503 and Pa. R.C.P. 1023.1 is denied.1. Pa. R.C.P. 1023.1

Rule 1023.1 was promulgated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania to provide trial courts with a procedure to deter groundless and abusive litigation practices in civil litigation. In summary, it provides *308that all pleadings must be signed, and thus certified, by an attorney of record (or pro se litigant) which represents to the court that he or she has read the pleading and, to the best of his or her…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thunberg v. StrauseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Slappo v. J's Development Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Brenckle v. ArblasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. In Re Estate of RoosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Bykowski v. Chesed, Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API