Legal Opinion

Nelson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 17, 2005No. 04-1366PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

In April 2003, Plaintiff-Appellant David Nelson filed a state-court suit for reformation and for breach of an automobile insurance contract against Defendanb-Appellee State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. He asserted entitlement to extended loss-of-wage personal-injury-protection (“PIP”) benefits under the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act (“CAARA”), Colo.Rev.Stat. §§ 10-4-701 to -726 (2000). 1 State Farm timely removed the action to federal district court and moved for dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), contending that the cause of action was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tele-Communications, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Jones v. CoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. Brennan v. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  5. Arnold v. Air Midwest, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Morris v. City of Colorado SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. Corder v. Lewis Palmer School District No. 38Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. Herrera v. City of EspanolaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  4. Wallace v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  5. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Kansas Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API