Commonwealth v. Yardley Y.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtIreland, C.J.
We granted the defendant’s application for further appellate review to consider whether the Juvenile Court judge properly denied the defendant’s motion for a new trial. The defendant sought to vacate his plea because he did not knowingly and voluntarily admit to sufficient facts where no interpreter was present during his plea colloquy and where he was denied effective assistance of counsel. The Appeals Court, in a *224memorandum and order issued pursuant to its rule 1:28, Commonwealth v. Yardley Y., 79 Mass. App. Ct. 1123 (2011), affirmed the denial of the defendant’s motion. Because the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Commonwealth v. LopezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. ComitaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Commonwealth v. a JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FrancisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- Commonwealth v. M.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. Dwight D.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
- Commonwealth v. GilbertMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. LugoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.