Legal Opinion

Anderson v. McKay

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1867PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from Panola. The case was tried "before Hon. Eeuben' A. Beeves, one of the district judges. All .that is necessary in the record is set forth in the opinion. The injunction was dissolved upon motion, without any answer by the defendant, so that the case turned upon the sufficiency of the petition to prevent the sale of lumber charged to be destined for 'the homestead. The plaintiff prosecuted error.

1Opinion of the CourtWillie, J.

The defendant in error obtained a judgment in the district court of Panola county against William P. Anderson, the plaintiff in error, for the sum of $112 80. An execution issued thereon, and the sheriff of said county levied it upon a lot of lumber belonging to said Anderson, and a writ of injunction was sued out to restrain the'sheriff from proceeding to sell the same. The material allegations of the petition for injunction were, that the petitioner was a married man, and was with his family living in a rented house in the town of Carthage, in said county; that he had bought two lots in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cobbs v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kempner v. Comer, Fairris & DialTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Andrews Et Ux. v. SEC. Bank of W. F.Texas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Moreland v. BarnhartTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Alexander v. HoltTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Morgan v. RountreeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API