Legal Opinion

Aleknagik Natives Ltd. v. Andrus

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 7, 1980No. 78-2986PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TANG, Circuit Judge:

The plaintiffs, three native Alaskan village corporations organized under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1628, and the village and municipal councils for those villages, filed a quiet title and ejectment action contesting the Secretary of the Department of the Interior’s (Secretary) interpretation of ANCSA to allow non-native entry, upon townsite lands that were unoccupied at the date of ANCSA’s enactment. Besides the Secretary, also named as defendants were the townsite trustees and three non-native persons, as alleged representatives…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Taniguchi v. SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Apple Computer, Inc. v. Formula International Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. California Care Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Malkit Singh v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Sherwood T. Rodrigues v. United States Secretary of Labor, Raymond J. Donovan, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API