Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bunn v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 21, 1980No. 79-314Published

1DissentJohn F. Stroud, Justice

I agree with the majority opinion that there was not substantial evidence to support the finding of the trial court that the parties agreed to purge the account of the late charge, but I respectfully dissent from that opinion because I believe the late charge was not interest and, therefore, not usury.

A monthly charge of 1.5% per month is clearly usurious under the Arkansas law if it is interest, but it just as clearly is not usurious if it is not interest. Labels are not to me controlling with one exception — if both parties to a transaction call or acquiesce to the charge being labeled as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Briggs v. SteeleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Hayes v. First National Bank of MemphisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  3. Harris v. Guaranty Financial CorporationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Redbarn Chemicals, Inc. v. BradshawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Brown v. Central Arkansas Production Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API