Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Fuller v. Riley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 21, 1960No. 60-441Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPearson, Judge

I concur fully in the holding set forth that: “consistent with the express provision of rule 3.2 subd. b, F.A.R., that the period of one calendar month as specifically provided by § 33.11(1), Fla.Stat., *501F.S.A., is the period within which appeals may be taken from the civil court of record”, and the reasoning which supports this holding, including, of course the rejection of the incorrect and unnecessary footnote to the case of In re Campbell’s Guardianship, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 352, 354. I further concur that the present holding should not be given a retroactive effect.

I dissent from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aronson v. Congregation Temple De HirschDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  2. In re Guardianship of CampbellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API