Legal Opinion

Lazensky v. Supreme Lodge K. of H

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 20, 1888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from trial term. Action by Maria Lazensky against the Supreme Lodge Knights of Honor, on a mutual benefit certificate. Defendant appeals from a judgment entered on a verdict for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtHehrbas, J.

The action is upon a benefit certificate issued by the defendant to Joseph Lazensky (now deceased) in favor of his wife, the plaintiff, for $2,000, in December, 1881. He was a member of Manhattan Lodge Ho. 1,165, *53K. of II., a subordinate lodge of the defendant. The certificate was payable ■out of the widows’ and orphans’ benefit fund, and, under the constitution and by-laws of the defendant, whenever the amount remaining in the treasury of that fund fell below $2,000, an assessment was levied, of which each subordinate lodge was required to pay its proportionate share, and the latter, in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shaw v. . Republic Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Grussy v. SchneiderNew York Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Dalton v. DanielsNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1859

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Supreme Forest of the Woodmen Circle v. StrettonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Marshall v. Women's Mutual InsuranceThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API