Legal Opinion

Harris v. City of Chattanooga

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided February 5, 1981No. Civ. A. C79-92RPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HAROLD L. MURPHY, District Judge.

Plaintiff’s husband was electrocuted while he was working at a construction site in Rossville, Georgia, allegedly due, in part, to the negligence of the defendant City of Chattanooga, d/b/a Electric Power Board (hereinafter “Power Board”) which conducts business in Georgia, and sells electric power in Walker, Catoosa and Dade Counties, Georgia. The Power Board is a proprietary division of The City of Chattanooga, a municipality which is organized and exists under the laws of the State of Tennessee.

The Power Board has moved for summary judgment premising…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Nevada v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Georgia v. City of ChattanoogaSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Whyy, Inc. v. Borough of GlassboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Hall v. University of NevadaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Air Crash Disaster at Washington, D.C. on January 13, 1982District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  2. Shorewood Packaging Corp. v. Commercial Union InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994
  3. Mullins v. M.G.D. Graphics System GroupDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994
  4. Kumagai v. CommonwealthDistrict Court, Northern Mariana Islands · 1984
  5. The City of Chattanooga Ex Rel. Don Lepard, Qui Tam v. Electric Power Board of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API