Legal Opinion
Tindle v. Jackson National Life Insurance Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided August 24, 1992No. 05-91-01068-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Justice.
Camille H. Tindle appeals from a summary judgment rendered in favor of Jackson National Life Insurance Company (the insurance company) and Kevin W. Roberts (the agent) in her suit for negligence, misrepresentation, and breach of contract. We conclude that Tindle’s claims against the insurance company are barred by the compulsory-counterclaim rule embodied in rule 97(a) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and that Tindle has failed to challenge all of the agent’s grounds for summary judgment. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Malooly Brothers, Inc. v. NapierTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Roark v. STALLWORTH OIL AND GAS, INCTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Wyatt v. Shaw Plumbing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Maxwell v. Texas Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Smith v. Tilton, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999
- Serna v. Webster, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
- Blalock Prescription Center, Inc. v. Lopez-Guerra, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- Montemayor v. City of San Antonio Fire Department, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.