Legal Opinion
State v. Snell
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 13, 2007No. 26,655PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRY, Judge.
{1} The State appeals from an order suppressing two sets of statements Defendant made to the police during an investigation of a car accident involving Defendant and another motorist. Defendant made the first statements while being questioned in the back seat of a police vehicle. He made the second statements later that evening when a police officer telephoned Defendant in his hotel room. The trial court suppressed the first statements on the basis that they were made while Defendant was in custody and had not been informed of his rights as required by Miranda v. Arizona,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SnellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. HernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. DavisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. AmayaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. HamiltonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.