Legal Opinion

Swartz v. Biben

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1925No. Appeal, 285PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

In this suit in assumpsit the record shows the following: Defendants filed an affidavit of defense on September 25, 1924. The next day plaintiffs filed a rule for judgment for wiant of a sufficient affidavit of defense. On October 14, 1924, the rule was discharged and defendants were directed to file ia supplemental and more specific affidavit of defense within fifteen days, or judgment. On October 30, 1924, a supplemental affidavit of defense was filed. On January 19, 1925, plaintiffs filed a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient supplemental affidavit of defense.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. District Attorney v. KistlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. First National Bank v. FairSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Road in Roaring Brook TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Burton v. TrainerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. Cox's Administrator v. HenrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Podvasnik v. PodvasnikSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Fell v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Donatelli v. CarinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Borough of State College v. PontiusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Taylor v. RichmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API