Legal Opinion

Hill v. Duncan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 24, 2001No. A01A0731PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MlKELL, Judge.

The parties to this action own property in Circle East subdivision in Stephens County. One of the subdivision’s restrictive covenants states that “[n]o mobile home shall be permitted on any lot.” When Bob F. Hill, Jr. and Jo-Ann Hill sought to place a modular home on their lot, Roger Duncan and Paul Westmoreland (“plaintiffs”) filed suit requesting declaratory and injunctive relief. The trial court denied their request, ruling that the structure at issue was not a mobile home. Plaintiffs appeal, and we affirm.

Whether a dwelling is a mobile home is a mixed question of law and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. White v. LegodaisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Rose v. BarbeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnston v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. King v. City of BainbridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. Vester v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. King v. City of BainbridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API