Legal Opinion
Mamo Transportation, Inc. v. Director, Department of Workforce Services
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided December 19, 2007No. E06-331PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
David M. Glover, Judge.
Appellant, Mamo Transportation, Inc., appeals the Board of Review’s decision that it is required to pay unemployment taxes on the drivers it engages because it failed to meet the three-prong test set forth in Arkansas Code Annotated section ll-10-210(e) to determine if its drivers are independent contractors. The Board of Review found that Mamo met the first prong but did not meet the second prong, and because of that it was unnecessary to address the third prong. On appeal, Mamo argues that it met the criteria of the second prong. We affirm the Board of Review’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carpetland U.S.A., Inc. v. Illinois Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- O'Hare-Midway Limousine Service, Inc. v. BakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Midwest Property Recovery, Inc. v. Job Service of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Employment Security Commission of Wyoming v. Laramie Cabs, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Vermont Institute of Community Involvement, Inc. v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mamo Transportation, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Mamo Transportation, Inc. v. Director, Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
- Mamo Transportation, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008