Legal Opinion

Bast v. Prudential Inurance Co. of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 2, 1998No. 97-35429PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:

Roger Timothy Bast, individually and as the personal representative of the estate of his late wife, Rhonda Rae Fleming Bast, and their minor son, Douglas Glenn Bast (“the Basts”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Prudential Insurance Company (“Prudential”). The Basts argue that Prudential acted in bad faith and breached its fiduciary duty to Rhonda Bast by delaying authorization for a potentially life-saving medical procedure. The district court held that all of the Basts’ state law claims were preempted by the Employee…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 22 Employee Benefits Cas. 1268, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4155, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5767, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8433 Roger Timothy Bast, Individually and as Personal Representative for the Estate of Rhonda Rae Fleming Bast Douglas Glenn Bast, a Minor Child v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, an Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API