Legal Opinion

Halstead v. Young

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1937No. Docket No. 66, Calendar No. 39,626PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Three questions are involved in this appeal.

Was Judge Doty, of the circuit court for the county of Oakland, in error when he granted a rehearing in a chancery canse heard by the late Judge Covert, after a finding of facts had been signed and filed but in which no decree had been entered by Judge Covert previous to his death?

Are defendants Young and wife, in the words of appellants “ entitled to maintain more than an eight-foot head of water at the dam on their property?”

Did defendants Young and wife acquire a prescriptive right to back water upon the lands owned by D. A. Hayward, one of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shearer v. MiddletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Williams v. BarberMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Stuart v. Detroit Finnish Co-Operative Summer Camp Assn.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Preston v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Tebbel v. Spencer Electric Light & Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Diking District No. 2 v. Calispel Duck ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API