Legal Opinion

Trustees of B.A.C. Local 32 Insurnace Fund v. Caloia

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 3, 2003No. 02-72167PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COHN, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This is a labor case. Plaintiffs are trustees of various multi-employer fringe benefit funds established through a collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) between unions and managements organizations for the benefit of employees in the tile industry. Plaintiffs are suing Paul Caloia d/b/a PFC Contracting, Paul Caloia d/b/a PFC Tile, and Paul Caloia 1 under ERISA to recover delinquent fringe benefit contributions they claim are due and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lewis v. Benedict Coal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Southwest Administrators, Inc. v. Rozay's Transfer, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Employers Insurance of Wausau, Counterclaim v. Petroleum Specialties, Inc., Counterclaim Third Party Zurich Insurance Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michigan Electrical Employees Pension Fund v. Encompass Electric & Data, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API