Legal Opinion

Ransom v. Mayorkas

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 7, 2024No. 1:22-cv-02355Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND EYPHRA RANSOM, * Plaintiff, * v. * Civil Action No. GLR-22-2355 ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., * Defendants. * *** MEMORANDUM OPINION THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants Alejandro Mayorkas and Deanne Criswell’s (“Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Transfer (ECF No. 26), and self-represented Plaintiff Eyphra Ransom’s Motion to Amend Pleading (ECF No. 34). The Motions are ripe for disposition, and no hearing is necessary. See Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md. 2023). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API