Carey v. Dunne
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Per curiam
The only question raised by the record has to do with the interpretation of the Federal Act here involved “insofar as it pertains to requirements of notice under the within agreed statement of facts.” The Municipal Court writ in this action was dated July 26, 1948, and was returnable on August 4, 1948. It thus appears that more than sixty days from May 24,1948, the day upon which the notice was served upon the defendant, had elapsed before the com mencement of the present suit and a fortiori before judgment therein. The local statute (R. L., c. 413, s. 12) authorizes this form of action only…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Porter v. WoodardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
- Muse v. Merrimack Valley National BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Harrington v. Metropolis Property Management Group, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Porter v. WoodardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
- Sellers v. SwitzerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951