Clark v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.
— After Sears Roebuck & Company terminated Darlene Clark’s at-will employment, she sued for wrongful termination. Because the specific written policy in Sears’ managers’ handbook upon which Clark purported to rely does not amount to a promise of specific treatment (i.e., discipline before termination) in her specific situation, her employment remained terminable at will. We therefore affirm the trial court’s dismissal of her claim.
FACTS
In 1976, Sears Roebuck & Company hired Darlene Clark as an employee. Clark signed a document containing the following language, making clear that her…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- DePhillips v. Zolt Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- DePhillips v. Zolt Const. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Bulman v. Safeway, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Bulman v. Safeway, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carlson v. Lake Chelan Community HospitalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Baker v. City of SeatacDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
- Carlson v. Lake Chelan Community Hosp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Goodman v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004