Pugh v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Senior Judge Kalish,
Respondent, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board), files preliminary objections to petitioner, Jesse Pughs, petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the Board to grant him a full Board hearing on the issue of his parole detainer. Respondent alleges that this court lacks jurisdiction over this matter and that petitioner has failed to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted. We overrule these objections.
In 1983, petitioner was paroled by the Connecticut Department of Correction, Division of Parole (Connecticut). His parole supervision…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bronson v. Commonwealth Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. JeromeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Moore v. RothSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Davis v. Pennsylvania Board of ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bostic v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- McGriff v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- J. Castelonia v. PA DOC & PBPPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019