Fleck and Associates, Inc. v. City of Phoenix
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 1) and Defendant City of Phoenix’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 5). For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant the City’s motion and deny Plaintiffs motion as moot.
I. Background.
Plaintiff Fleck and Associates, Inc. (“Fleck”) is a for-profit corporation. Fleck’s complaint alleges the following relevant facts: Fleck owns and operates Flex, a gay men’s social club in Phoenix, Arizona. (Comp^ 5). In addition to providing health club facilities, Flex rents rooms to members and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fleck and Associates, Inc., an Arizona Corporation v. Phoenix, City Of, an Arizona Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- 832 CORP. INC. v. Gloucester Tp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Fleck and Associates, Inc. v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006