Kivo v. Levitt
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs, essentially for the reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice Staley at the Appellate Division.
We agree with the court below that respondent’s interpretation of section 2 (subd 2, par a) of the Retirement and Social Security Law as excluding deferred pay increases not yet paid to the retiree from the wage base for computation of pension benefits is entirely proper and must be upheld. We note, however, that we express no opinion on the question whether section 431 of the Retirement and Social Security…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of McCollum v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Abrams v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Matter of Awe v. D'AlessandroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Claim of Merendino v. Village of PawlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Matter of Benjamin v. New York City Employees Retirement Sys.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.