Santa Rita Land & Mining Co. v. Mercer
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and' for the County of Pima. W. H. Barnes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtKibbey, J.
The reeord in this cause presents no question for our consideration. The action was to recover possession of real estate. There was a trial by the court and judgment for the appellee, the defendant below.
The findings of the court, which are voluminous and elaborate, are copied into the transcript, but there was no exception reserved to them.
The minute entries of the clerk transcribed into the record before us refer to, and inferentially indicate, that there was .a motion for a new trial.
The motion -is not in the record in any way.. Section 842 *182of the Revised Statutes of 1887 prescribes that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Continental Insurance v. MillikenTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Tudor v. HodgesTexas Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tucker v. ReilArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- J. H. Mulrein Plumbing Supply Co. v. WalshArizona Supreme Court · 1924
- Eads v. MurphyArizona Supreme Court · 1925