Scungio Borst & Associates v. 410 Shurs Lane Developers, LLC
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JUSTICE TODD
In this appeal, we consider whether a contractor may maintain an action under the Contractor and Subcontractor Payment Act (“CASPA”) 1 against a property owner’s agents. After careful review, we hold that a contractor may not do so, and, accordingly, we affirm the order of the Superior Court.
By way of statutory background, CASPA generally provides that a contractor or subcontractor who improves real property pursuant to a contract is entitled to timely payment pursuant to governing contract terms, or, in the absence of such terms, according to a statutorily-specified…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Governor's Office v. Office of Open Records, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Revere Press, Inc. v. BLUMBERGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Ruthrauff, Inc. v. Ravin, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Meyer v. Community College of Beaver CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Buradus v. General Cement Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Dubose, R. v. Willowcrest Nur. Home, Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- El-Gharbaoui, A. v. Ajayi, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Commonwealth v. Cousins, M., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Humphrey, P. v. GlaxoSmithKline PLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- In Re Fortieth Statewide Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.