Legal Opinion

Halsey v. A.B. Chance Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 14, 1997No. 1950235Published

1Dissent

I must respectfully dissent. I believe the summary judgment was proper because the evidence shows, as a matter of law, that Roderick Halsey's death was caused by his own negligence and that the defendants had no duty to warn or otherwise protect Mr. Halsey.

Contributory negligence as a defense to an AEMLD action may be found as a matter of law:

" 'In order to sustain a finding of contributory negligence as a matter of law, there must be a finding that the plaintiff put himself in danger's way, Mackintosh Co. v. Wells, 218 Ala. 260, 118 So. 276 (1928), and a finding that the plaintiff…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Central Alabama Elec. Co-Op. v. TapleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Elba Wood Products, Inc. v. BrackinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. MacKintosh Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Baptist Medical Center v. ByarsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API