Halsey v. A.B. Chance Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Dissent
I must respectfully dissent. I believe the summary judgment was proper because the evidence shows, as a matter of law, that Roderick Halsey's death was caused by his own negligence and that the defendants had no duty to warn or otherwise protect Mr. Halsey.
Contributory negligence as a defense to an AEMLD action may be found as a matter of law:
" 'In order to sustain a finding of contributory negligence as a matter of law, there must be a finding that the plaintiff put himself in danger's way, Mackintosh Co. v. Wells, 218 Ala. 260, 118 So. 276 (1928), and a finding that the plaintiff…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Central Alabama Elec. Co-Op. v. TapleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Elba Wood Products, Inc. v. BrackinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- MacKintosh Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Baptist Medical Center v. ByarsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.